Australia’s remittance sector plays a critical role in supporting migrant communities and facilitating the flow of funds to families and businesses abroad. These services are often lifelines for communities with strong international ties, and they serve as vital financial infrastructure in underserved markets. However, as the federal government moves toward implementing Tranche 2 of its Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing (AML/CTF) reforms, remittance service providers (RSPs) face increasing regulatory pressure and a host of compliance challenges.

Although many RSPs are already regulated under Tranche 1 via AUSTRAC registration and reporting, Tranche 2 expands and intensifies compliance expectations — particularly for informal and smaller operators, or those operating in higher-risk corridors. The changes are designed to bring Australia in line with international standards and close gaps that could be exploited for money laundering or terrorism financing. For RSPs, however, the transition will not be without cost or complexity.

Understanding Tranche 2 and Its Impact on RSPs

Tranche 2 aims to extend the AML/CTF regime to cover designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs), such as lawyers, accountants, real estate agents, and certain high-risk activities — including areas within the remittance ecosystem that may currently operate in legal grey zones or with light oversight.

For RSPs, the pressure under Tranche 2 doesn’t just come from direct obligations, but also from increased scrutiny, stricter enforcement, and expectations of enhanced internal controls. Operators who previously complied with minimum standards may now face more detailed audits, stricter registration requirements, and higher thresholds for internal governance.

Key Compliance Challenges

1. Complex and Evolving Regulatory Requirements

Even before Tranche 2, RSPs were subject to AML/CTF laws. However, Tranche 2 may introduce tighter due diligence, transaction monitoring, and record-keeping expectations, especially for cross-border flows involving higher-risk jurisdictions. Smaller providers may lack the legal and technical expertise to interpret and implement new rules correctly.

2. Cost of Compliance

Many RSPs are small, family-run businesses operating on tight margins. The cost of compliance — including system upgrades, external consultants, legal advice, and staff training — can be financially burdensome, particularly when profit per transaction is low. These costs may drive some providers out of the market or into informality, increasing the very risks Tranche 2 aims to mitigate.

3. Access to Banking Services

One of the most pressing issues in the remittance industry is “de-banking” — where financial institutions close accounts of RSPs due to perceived AML risk. Tranche 2 may inadvertently worsen this problem, as banks adopt even more conservative risk appetites. Without clear regulatory guidance and risk-sharing mechanisms, compliant RSPs may find it harder to maintain essential banking relationships.

4. Technology and Infrastructure Gaps

Effective AML/CTF compliance increasingly relies on robust digital systems for transaction monitoring, customer onboarding, and record retention. Many RSPs still operate with manual processes or basic systems that are not easily scalable or adaptable to increased compliance expectations.

5. Customer Identification and KYC Challenges

A significant portion of remittance clients are underbanked individuals — including migrants, refugees, and those lacking conventional identity documents. Enforcing strict Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures may alienate legitimate users, reduce transaction volumes, and drive customers to informal channels, defeating the purpose of regulation.

6. Lack of Tailored Regulatory Support

The remittance industry in Australia is diverse — from global fintech platforms to informal community-based services. Yet, compliance guidance from regulators is often generic and not tailored to the unique operational models and cultural nuances of smaller RSPs. This creates confusion and inconsistent practices across the sector.

The Broader Risk: Informal Channels

One unintended consequence of overly burdensome compliance is the growth of informal or underground remittance networks. If regulation becomes too complex or costly, well-intentioned operators may exit the market, and customers may turn to unregulated alternatives, increasing systemic risk and reducing transparency in international money flows.

Navigating the Future

To remain sustainable and compliant under Tranche 2, remittance service providers should:

1. Review and strengthen AML/CTF risk assessments
2. Invest in scalable, digital compliance systems
3. Train staff on enhanced obligations and reporting standards
4. Engage with regulators and industry associations for up-to-date guidance
5. Advocate for proportionate, risk-based regulation that distinguishes between large, institutional providers and small community-based operators

Meanwhile, AUSTRAC and policymakers must play a proactive role by:

1. Offering industry-specific guidance tailored to remittance models
2. Providing transitional support and funding for system upgrades
3. Ensuring that banking access is protected for compliant RSPs
4. Promoting a risk-based regulatory culture rather than a one-size-fits-all approach

Conclusion

Tranche 2 presents both a challenge and an opportunity for Australia’s remittance industry. While the objective of deterring financial crime is critical, regulations must be pragmatic, proportionate, and inclusive. If implemented with care, Tranche 2 can help build trust in the remittance system and promote financial inclusion. If mishandled, it risks driving operators underground and cutting off essential services for Australia’s multicultural communities.

‍